Software Images icon An illustration of two photographs. Images Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape Donate Ellipses icon An illustration of text ellipses. The craft of research Item Preview. EMBED for wordpress. Want more? Bizup and FitzGerald provide fresh examples and standardized terminology to clarify concepts like argument, warrant, and problem. Following the same guiding principle as earlier editions—that the skills of doing and reporting research are not just for elite students but for everyone—this new edition retains the accessible voice and direct approach that have made The Craft of Research a leader in the field of research reference.
With updated examples and information on evaluation and using contemporary sources, this beloved classic is ready for the next generation of researchers. Score: 4. Seasoned researchers and educators Wayne C. Williams present a fundamental and accessible text that explains how to build an argument that engages and persuades readers, how to effectively anticipate and respond to the reservations of readers, and how to find and evaluate sources and integrate them into an argument.
The fourth edition has been carefully and respectfully revised by Joseph Bizup and William T. It retains all the wisdom and sound advice of earlier editions but now reflects the way research and writing practices are taught today, as well as how students find and engage with sources in the digital age, and the extensive bibliography of subject area resources has been thoroughly updated.
Throughout, The Craft of Research, Fourth Edition, preserves the amiable tone, the reliable voice, and the sense of directness that have made this book an indispensable guide for anyone undertaking a research project. This highly respected textbook covers how to appraise and apply existing research evidence, as well as how to participate in research and quality improvement projects. Coverage of quantitative, qualitative, and other research methodologies provides a solid foundation to conduct, appraise, and apply research evidence to the realities of today's clinical practice.
Balanced coverage of qualitative and quantitative methods addresses the qualitative research methodologies that are often the starting point of research projects, particularly in magnet hospitals and DNP programs. Clear, comprehensive coverage is organized into five units that include: an introduction to nursing research; coverage of the research process; application for evidence-based health care; how to analyze data, determine outcomes, and disseminate research; and how to propose and seek funding for research.
Strong emphasis on evidence-based practice addresses this key graduate-level QSEN competency and reinforces how to generate research evidence and appraise and synthesize existing research for application to clinical practice. Rich examples from nursing literature bring research principles to life. Yet there has hitherto been little training available for this genre of writing.
Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass. User icon An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up Log in. Web icon An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine Texts icon An illustration of an open book. Books Video icon An illustration of two cells of a film strip. What if no one ever wore masks except for safety? What if everyone wore masks in public? What if it were customary to wear masks on blind dates? In marriage ceremonies?
At funerals? How are masks and cosmetic surgery alike? Elias shows that masked balls became popular in eighteenth-century London in response to anxi- eties about social mobility. Did the same anxieties cause similar developments in Venice? Elias supports his claim about masked balls with pub- lished sources.
Is it also supported by letters and diaries? Smith analyzes costumes from an economic point of view. What would an economic analysis of masks turn up? Now ask questions that re? But could there be a larger pattern of all masks creating a sense of alternative forms of social or spiritual life? We discuss in more detail how to use disagreements with sources in 6.
Many journal articles end with a paragraph or two about open questions, ideas for more re- search, and so on see p. You might not be able to do all the research they suggest, but you might carve out a piece of it.
Record questions that spark your interest. Look for questions whose answers might make you and, ideally, your readers think about your topic in a new way. Do the Inuit use masks in their wedding ceremonies? Questions that ask how and why invite deeper thinking than who, what, when, or where, and deeper thinking leads to more interesting an- swers. Would church ser- vices be as well attended if the congregation all wore masks?
How many black cats slept in the Alamo the night before the battle? You might, however, be wrong about that. So who knows where a question about cats in the Alamo might take you? Once you have a few promising questions, try to combine them into larger ones. Whose purposes does each story serve?
Even so, once you have a question that holds your interest, you must pose a tougher one about it: So what? Beyond your own interest in its answer, why would others think it a question worth asking? You might not be able to answer that So what? How will not answering it keep us from understanding something else better than we do?
Start by asking So what? What do we lose? Your answer might be Nothing. I just want to know. Answer- ing So what? But you must work toward that answer throughout your project. You can do that in three steps. Fill in the blank with your topic, using some of those nouns de- rived from verbs: I am studying the causes of the disappearance of large North Ameri- can mammals. I am studying the causes of the disappearance of large North American mammals 2.
From Topics to Questions 47 If you are a new researcher and get this far, congratulate your- self, because you have moved beyond the aimless collection of data. But now, if you can, take one step more. They must have an answer to So what? Introduce this second implied question with in order to help my reader understand how, why, or whether: 1.
Or: Is risk taking geneti- cally based? And if you are doing advanced research, you must take that step, because answering that last question is your ticket into the conversation of your community of researchers.
Regularly test your progress by asking a roommate, relative, or friend to force you to? To summarize: Your aim is to explain 1. A q u i c k t i p : Finding Topics If you are a beginner, start with our suggestions about skimming bibliographical guides 3. If you still draw a blank, try these steps. The less common, the better. Where would you like to travel?
What particular aspect sur- prises you or makes you want to know more? Wander through a museum with exhibitions that appeal to you—artworks, dinosaurs, old cars. Stop when something catches your interest. What more do you want to know about it? Wander through a shopping mall or store, asking yourself, How do they make that? Or, I wonder who thought up that product? Leaf through a Sunday newspaper, especially its features sec- tions. Skim reviews of books or movies, in newspapers or on the Internet.
Browse a large magazine rack. Look for trade magazines or those that cater to specialized interests. Investigate whatever catches your interest. Read the posts, looking for something that surprises you or that you disagree with. Tune into talk radio or interview programs on TV until you hear a claim you disagree with. See whether you can make a case to refute it. Narrow the search to exclude dot-com sites. Is there a common belief that you suspect is simplistic or just wrong? Do research to make a case against it.
What courses will you take in the future? What research would help you prepare for them? Browse through a textbook of a course that is one level beyond yours or a course that you know you will have to take. Look especially hard at the study questions. Browse its ar- chives, looking for matters of controversy or uncertainty. Surf the Web sites of departments at major universities, in- cluding class sites.
Also check sites of museums, national as- sociations, and government agencies, if they seem relevant. If you are an advanced researcher, you know how essential this step is. But if you are new to research, understanding its importance may prove challenging. These steps describe not only the development of your project, but your own as a researcher. At that point, you have posed a problem that they recognize needs a solution.
Too many researchers at all levels write as if their only task is to answer a question that interests them alone. They fail to understand that their answer must solve a problem that others in their community think needs a solution.
Everyday research usually begins not with dreaming up a topic to think about but with a practical problem that, if you ignore it, means trouble.
The Car Shoppe, East 55th Street. How many votes do I lose if I refuse? Do a survey. Most of my constituents support gun control. I can reject the request. What changed? Increase in turnover.
If we improve training and mo- rale, our workers will stick with us. Then on the basis of that better understanding, someone had to decide what to do to solve the practical problem, then report their re- search so that their solution could be shared and studied. Graphically, the relationship between practical and research problems looks like this: 4. We solve a practical problem by doing something or by encouraging others to do something that eliminates the cause of the problem or at least ameliorates its costs.
We solve a conceptual problem not by doing something to change the world but by answering a question that helps us understand it better. In our everyday world, a problem is something we try to avoid. But in academic research, a problem is something we seek out, even invent if we have to. Indeed, a researcher without a good conceptual problem to work on faces a bad practical problem, because without a re- search problem, a researcher is out of work.
There is a second reason inexperienced researchers sometimes struggle with this notion of a research problem. Experienced re- searchers often talk about their work in shorthand. When asked what they are working on, they often answer with what sounds like one of those general topics we warned you about: adult measles, mating calls of Wyoming elk, zeppelins in the s.
As a result, some beginners think that having a topic to read about is the same as having a problem to solve. When they do, they create a big practical problem for them- selves, because without a research question to answer, with only a topic to guide their work, they gather data aimlessly and end- lessly, with no way of knowing when they have enough. Then they struggle to decide what to include in their report and what not, usually throwing in everything, just to be on the safe side.
That begins with understanding how conceptual problems work. But suppose you were bul- lied into the date and would rather be anywhere else.
To be part of a practical, tangible problem, a condition can be any- thing, so long as it imposes intolerable costs. Suppose you win a million dollars in the lottery but owe a loan shark two million and your name gets in the paper. Winning the lottery turns out to be a Big Problem. To state a practical problem so that others understand it clearly, you must describe both its parts. Its condition: I missed the bus.
The hole in the ozone layer is growing. Many will die from skin cancer. So what you think is a problem, they might not. To make your problem their problem, you must frame it from their point of view, so that they see its costs to them. To do that, imagine that when you pose the condition part of your problem, your reader responds, So what? So what? You answer with the cost of the problem: A bigger hole exposes us to more ultraviolet light. Suppose he again asks, So what?
If, however improbably, he again asks, So what? We acknowledge a problem only when we stop asking So what? In academic research, how- ever, your problems will usually be conceptual ones, which are harder to grasp because both their conditions and costs are not palpable but abstract. You can identify the condition of a conceptual problem by com- pleting that three-step sentence 3.
In the second step, the indi- rect question states the condition of a conceptual problem, what you do not know or understand: I am studying stories of the Alamo, because I want to understand why voters responded to them in ways that served the interests of Texas politicians.
A conceptual problem does not have such a tangible cost. The condition and the consequence of a conceptual problem are both questions: Q1 and Q2. But they fail to realize that researchers want to answer a ques- tion like that so that they can answer a second, more important one.
For those who care about the way folk games in? From Questions to a Problem 59 4. When the solution to a research problem does have practical consequences, we call the research applied.
Does it refer to knowing or doing? Topic: I am studying the electromagnetic radiation in a section of the universe 2. That is pure research, because step 3 refers only to understanding. In an applied research problem, the second step refers to know- ing, but that third step refers to doing: 1.
That is an applied problem because only when astronomers know how to account for atmospheric distortion can they do what they want to—measure light more accurately. Most readers would think that the link between steps 2 and 3 is a bit of a stretch. To formulate a useful applied research problem, you have to show that the answer to the indirect question in step 2 plausibly helps answer the indirect question in step 3.
The answer would seem to be Yes. Now try the test on the Alamo problem: a If my readers want to protect themselves from unscrupulous politicians, b would they think they could if they knew how nineteenth- century politicians used stories about the Alamo to shape public opinion?
If you think that the solution to your conceptual problem might apply to a practical one, formulate your problem as the pure re- search problem it is, then add your application as a fourth step: 1.
Potential Practical Application: so that readers might bet- ter protect themselves from unscrupulous politicians. Then wait until your conclusion to suggest its practical application.
For more on this, see chapter Most research projects in the humanities and many in the nat- ural and social sciences have no direct application to daily life. But as the term pure suggests, many researchers value such research more than they do applied. As you may have guessed, the three of us are deeply commit- ted to pure research, but also to applied—so long as the research is done well and is not corrupted by malign motives.
That raises an ethical question that we touch on in our afterword on ethics. But you might help us better understand a small part of one, and that can move us closer to a practical solution. But researchers often begin a project without be- ing clear about what their real problem is.
Some researchers have even won fame for disproving a plausible hypoth- esis that they had set out to prove. Few of us can. But thinking about it early will save you hours of work along the way and per- haps panic toward the end. It also gets you into a frame of mind crucial to advanced work. Here are some ways you can aim for a problem from the start and along the way.
Why would anyone want an answer to your question? What would they do with it? What new questions might an answer raise? Ask your teacher what she is working on and whether you can work on part of it. Nothing discourages a teacher more than a student who does exactly what is suggested and no more. Teachers want you to use their suggestions to start your thinking, not end it.
Where in them do you see contradictions, inconsistencies, incomplete ex- planations? Tentatively assume that other readers would or should feel the same. Countless research papers have refuted a point that no one ever made. Be- fore you correct a source, reread it carefully. If a source says X and you think Y, you may have a research problem, but only if you can show that those who misunderstand X misunderstand some larger issue, as well.
Finally, read the last few pages of your sources closely. We usually do our best thinking in the last few pages we write. If in an early draft you arrive at an unanticipated claim, ask yourself what question it might answer. Paradoxical as it might seem, you may have answered a question that you have not yet asked, and thereby solved a problem that you have not yet posed. A still bigger dream is to solve a problem that no one even knew they had. But your teachers do want you to practice the mental habits that prepare you for that moment.
That means doing more than just accumu- lating and reporting facts. But in business and gov- ernment, in law and medicine, in politics and international diplo- macy, no skill is valued more highly than the ability to recognize a problem, then to articulate it in a way that convinces others both to care about it and to believe it can be solved, especially by you.
We three authors have felt those anxieties, not just starting out, but long after our hair had grayed. Keep a journal in which you re? They want you to succeed, and you can expect their help. If you are more experienced, you might skip to the next chapter; if you are very experienced, skip to part III. But if you have a question and at least one promising answer the phi- losopher C. Peirce called it a hypothesis on probation , you can start looking for data to test it.
To do that e;ciently, you need a plan. If you plunge into any and all sources on your topic, you risk losing yourself in an end- less trail of books and articles. To be sure, aimless browsing can be fun, even productive. Many important discoveries have begun in a chance encounter with an unexpected idea. The three of us indulge in it a lot. In his- tory, for example, primary sources include documents from the period or person you are studying, objects, maps, even clothing; in literature or philosophy, your main primary source is usually the text you are studying, and your data are the words on the page.
In the early stages of research, you can use tertiary sources to get a feel for a topic. Many distinguished researchers write such books. But they sometimes oversimplify the research, and their work usually dates quickly. As with secondary sources, a source like an encyclopedia could be a primary source if you were studying, say, how encyclopedias deal with gender issues. The three of us work online whenever we can.
But you must distinguish online resources that are extensions of li- braries and are as reliable from random Internet sources whose reliability is always in doubt.
Most state universities allow guest access to their online catalogs but not their databases. Library in Atlanta. If you use online catalogs, bibliographies, and data- bases thoughtfully, you can do a great deal with a small library and interlibrary loan loans take time, so start early. Start with an overview of the research on your topic. Large libraries even have specialists in particular topics. They can show you how to use the catalog and other specialized online re- sources.
If you feel too shy or proud to ask questions in person, e-mail them. You will save both your time and theirs if you prepare your ques- tions, even rehearse them. Too embarrassed to ask, she wandered for two more days through seven?
Wayne C. Booth — was the George M. Gregory G. Joseph M. William T.
0コメント